Comments on: Review: The First Three Hours Of ‘Stargate Universe’ http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368 Building Better Geeks Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Sony http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-8077 Sony Wed, 19 May 2010 09:22:50 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-8077 I adore Stargate Universe! :) I adore Stargate Universe! :)

]]> By: Sony http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-10217 Sony Wed, 19 May 2010 09:22:00 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-10217 I adore Stargate Universe! :) I adore Stargate Universe! :)

]]> By: Angie http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-7877 Angie Tue, 11 May 2010 13:51:30 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-7877 Awesome post!!! Awesome post!!!

]]> By: Angie http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-10216 Angie Tue, 11 May 2010 13:51:00 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-10216 Awesome post!!! Awesome post!!!

]]> By: Sue Mitchell http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-6495 Sue Mitchell Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:48:25 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-6495 SG.U(seless) had the disadvantage of introducing a large and motley crew in a dark and confused setting, so it was difficult to register many of the new characters. The few I registered were Nicholas Hush because I already knew the actor and that he was in the show. Then there was the pudgy kid, Eli Alex Rogan-Wallis, who, to be fair, isn't as bad as Wesley Crusher, the waste-of-space senator and his drippy daughter, Chloe, whose name I only remember because it's our daughter-in-law's name. Then there was the tarty blonde bint whose name escapes me, a colonel and a lieutenant, also nameless in my mind, but no one who had any obvious leadership skills. Apparently, there was a sex scene that was cut for the benefit of the Brits. Why? We're not the ones who get our knickers in a bunch over a bit of nudity. Not that there was any 'eye candy' anyway. And would someone PLEASE give the 'hand-held' camera man a steadicam and SHOW HIM HOW TO USE IT!!! To sum up in one word: BORING. -- SG.U(seless) had the disadvantage of introducing a large and motley crew in a dark and confused setting, so it was difficult to register many of the new characters.
The few I registered were Nicholas Hush because I already knew the actor and that he was in the show. Then there was the pudgy kid, Eli Alex Rogan-Wallis, who, to be fair, isn’t as bad as Wesley Crusher, the waste-of-space senator
and his drippy daughter, Chloe, whose name I only remember because it’s our daughter-in-law’s name. Then there was the tarty blonde bint whose name escapes me, a colonel and a lieutenant, also nameless in my mind, but no one who had any obvious leadership skills.
Apparently, there was a sex scene that was cut for the benefit of the Brits. Why? We’re not the ones who get our knickers in a bunch over a bit of nudity. Not that there was any ‘eye candy’ anyway.

And would someone PLEASE give the ‘hand-held’ camera man a steadicam and SHOW HIM HOW TO USE IT!!!

To sum up in one word: BORING.
–

]]> By: Sue Mitchell http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-10215 Sue Mitchell Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-10215 SG.U(seless) had the disadvantage of introducing a large and motley crew in a dark and confused setting, so it was difficult to register many of the new characters. The few I registered were Nicholas Hush because I already knew the actor and that he was in the show. Then there was the pudgy kid, Eli Alex Rogan-Wallis, who, to be fair, isn't as bad as Wesley Crusher, the waste-of-space senator and his drippy daughter, Chloe, whose name I only remember because it's our daughter-in-law's name. Then there was the tarty blonde bint whose name escapes me, a colonel and a lieutenant, also nameless in my mind, but no one who had any obvious leadership skills. Apparently, there was a sex scene that was cut for the benefit of the Brits. Why? We're not the ones who get our knickers in a bunch over a bit of nudity. Not that there was any 'eye candy' anyway. And would someone PLEASE give the 'hand-held' camera man a steadicam and SHOW HIM HOW TO USE IT!!! To sum up in one word: BORING. -- SG.U(seless) had the disadvantage of introducing a large and motley crew in a dark and confused setting, so it was difficult to register many of the new characters.
The few I registered were Nicholas Hush because I already knew the actor and that he was in the show. Then there was the pudgy kid, Eli Alex Rogan-Wallis, who, to be fair, isn’t as bad as Wesley Crusher, the waste-of-space senator
and his drippy daughter, Chloe, whose name I only remember because it’s our daughter-in-law’s name. Then there was the tarty blonde bint whose name escapes me, a colonel and a lieutenant, also nameless in my mind, but no one who had any obvious leadership skills.
Apparently, there was a sex scene that was cut for the benefit of the Brits. Why? We’re not the ones who get our knickers in a bunch over a bit of nudity. Not that there was any ‘eye candy’ anyway.

And would someone PLEASE give the ‘hand-held’ camera man a steadicam and SHOW HIM HOW TO USE IT!!!

To sum up in one word: BORING.
–

]]> By: Blah with a capital "B" http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-6487 Blah with a capital "B" Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:14:28 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-6487 It was BOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIINNGGGG!!! Oh, Gawd, was it boring. And I didn't care about any of the characters, either. I didn't like them, the dialogue, the acting.... In my opinion, save for the sex scene at the beginning, it was like every other Stargate—except that the humor and charm were completely lacking. That, in my opinion, is what has always saved Stargate in the past. In general, though I am a fan, I acknowledge that the Stargate shows can be tedious and dull. But as I say, they have the quirkiness, humor and fun to make them enjoyable all the same. But this incarnation? It's just plain tedious and dull. It has absolutely no saving graces. It was BOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIINNGGGG!!!

Oh, Gawd, was it boring. And I didn’t care about any of the characters, either. I didn’t like them, the dialogue, the acting…. In my opinion, save for the sex scene at the beginning, it was like every other Stargate—except that the humor and charm were completely lacking. That, in my opinion, is what has always saved Stargate in the past. In general, though I am a fan, I acknowledge that the Stargate shows can be tedious and dull. But as I say, they have the quirkiness, humor and fun to make them enjoyable all the same. But this incarnation? It’s just plain tedious and dull. It has absolutely no saving graces.

]]> By: Blah with a capital "B" http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-10214 Blah with a capital "B" Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:14:00 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-10214 It was BOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIINNGGGG!!! Oh, Gawd, was it boring. And I didn't care about any of the characters, either. I didn't like them, the dialogue, the acting.... In my opinion, save for the sex scene at the beginning, it was like every other Stargate—except that the humor and charm were completely lacking. That, in my opinion, is what has always saved Stargate in the past. In general, though I am a fan, I acknowledge that the Stargate shows can be tedious and dull. But as I say, they have the quirkiness, humor and fun to make them enjoyable all the same. But this incarnation? It's just plain tedious and dull. It has absolutely no saving graces. It was BOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIINNGGGG!!!

Oh, Gawd, was it boring. And I didn’t care about any of the characters, either. I didn’t like them, the dialogue, the acting…. In my opinion, save for the sex scene at the beginning, it was like every other Stargate—except that the humor and charm were completely lacking. That, in my opinion, is what has always saved Stargate in the past. In general, though I am a fan, I acknowledge that the Stargate shows can be tedious and dull. But as I say, they have the quirkiness, humor and fun to make them enjoyable all the same. But this incarnation? It’s just plain tedious and dull. It has absolutely no saving graces.

]]> By: Duwayne Sexton http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-6485 Duwayne Sexton Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:11:52 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-6485 So long time veiwers of Stargate probably wont care but I would have liked to have seen atleast a small cameo of Tealc , Vala and Cameron . So long time veiwers of Stargate probably wont care but I would have liked to have seen atleast a small cameo of Tealc , Vala and Cameron .

]]> By: Duwayne Sexton http://popculturezoo.com/archives/4368/comment-page-2#comment-10213 Duwayne Sexton Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:11:00 +0000 http://popculturezoo.com/?p=4368#comment-10213 So long time veiwers of Stargate probably wont care but I would have liked to have seen atleast a small cameo of Tealc , Vala and Cameron . So long time veiwers of Stargate probably wont care but I would have liked to have seen atleast a small cameo of Tealc , Vala and Cameron .

]]>